→ articles to End
the war in Ukraine
reasons to End
nuclear weapons
The recent drone attack by Ukraine on the Kremlin (Russia's equivalent to the US White House) is dangerous for all Americans and Europeans. But even More Dangerous is giving advanced long-range missiles, which Ukraine could use to attack Russia proper and spark a full-scale war between Russia and US-Europe.
For if a country provides long-range missiles (or provides fighter jets) for Ukraine to attack Moscow or other Russian cities; then isn't that country (providing the weapons) provoking a war against Russia? What if a country provided missiles, attack-jets, and training to a certain country or group in order for them to strike at London? – Then isn't that 'weapons-provider' provoking or starting a war with England?
Ukraine of course denies that it sent these drone bombs at the Kremlin, and it is against international agreed law and humanitarian laws to bomb a non-military civilian area, and the US also denies its knowledge or involvement. But there is little doubt that the Ukraine military or secret service was responsible for the bombing attack.
So, US Intelligence (which has been advising-helping Ukraine all along) either: (a) knew about the plans and gave approval to it (and maybe also helped), OR (b) US Intelligence did not know of the plan – which implies that Ukraine 'intentionally hid' their plans from US Intelligence, CIA officials and US advisors.
If (a) is true, then the US is an 'accomplice' or co-actor in the Kremlin bombing, and thus co-responsible – which then means that the US is provoking an official war with Russia. Did the US Congress (the voted representatives of American citizens) approve of going to war against Russia? No, they did not.
So then, what if (b) is true? ...that Ukraine planned and executed this attack 'all on their own', and they kept these plans secret from US and UK Intelligence (their advisors). Well, that possibility is equally as disturbing as (a) – because it shows that the US and UK Intelligence Do Not really know what Ukraine will do with the high-powered weapons that we provide to them. In other words, Ukraine could use those weapons in anyway they wish, even in ways that could likely provoke a massive escalation of this war that would directly involve the US, UK and Nato nations. And it is quite likely that this escalation of the US and Nato as a direct combatant ...is precisely what Ukraine wants – they want the US and Nato to go all-in to win their war against Russia.
Therefore, by giving Ukraine high-powered long-range missiles and/or fighter jets, we are in fact giving Ukraine the possibility (and green light?) to attack deep into Russia or into Crimea (which Russia has regarded by law as Russian territory for the past 9 years), or even to attack Moscow – which implicates the weapons-providers as an obvious accomplice in the war. It's like if a certain nation had provided Northern Ireland with high-powered weapons for bombing attacks on London; isn't that weapons-provider instigating a war against England? Or it's like if a nation were to provide long-range missiles to Cuba which Cuba then uses to bomb attack Washington; isn't that nation (providing the weapons) instigating a war against the US?
So → Did the US and UK know of and give an approval for the drone attack on the Kremlin? (which implicates them as accomplices in the act)
Or → Did the US and UK not know of Ukraine's plans to launch a drone attack on the Kremlin? (which implies that the US and UK are often clueless as to how Ukraine will use their highly-advanced long-range weapons that US-Nato provided them)
US Secretary of State Blinken said the US had “no advanced warning” of the drone attack, and the National Security spokesman John Kirby said, “I can assure you the United States had no role in it whatsoever” and he stated that the US has told Ukraine to never strike into proper Russia.
Therefore – if Blinken and Kirby are telling us the truth, then Can Ukraine be trusted with long-range attack missiles and fighter jets?? ...Trusted that they will not bomb into Russia or Moscow, and instigate an all-out full-scale war between the US-Nato and Russia?
Because, by what Blinken and Kirby said, the US and Nato have no control (and often no knowledge) of How Ukraine Will Use Those Weapons !! (those offensive weapons that were given to Ukraine for the specific intention to fight against Russia)
In conclusion, by providing Ukraine with long-range missiles and long-range fighter jets, the US, UK, and EU governments are Endangering all European cities and citizens.
So here are the important questions to ask –
Do Americans and Europeans want to enter into an all-out war against Russia? – by providing the weapons and giving assistance and approval for bombing Moscow? (and thereby opening the possible door for retaliation on London, Berlin, or Washington?)
Or, Do Americans and Europeans want to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles and jets – that Ukraine can then use (on their own discretion) to bomb Moscow? (in order to provoke a full-scale war between Russia and the US, UK and other Nato countries)
