Creating a Non-violent World
with Peace – not war

    using Diplomacy – not weapons
    engaging in Peace Talks – not more killing

           


We must shift the arms race into a peace race.

~ Martin Luther King Jr

I must cry out when I see war escalated at any point.

~ Martin Luther King Jr

The Massive $858 Billion-dollar Military Budget is INSANE

– Money that could be used for –
Helping People pay for Food and Housing
Affordable Healthcare and Education
Small Business Loans and Higher Wages
Solving the Global Climate Crises


WHY CAN'T WE REDUCE THE MILITARY ?

Create PEACE in the World – Not War
Solve Conflicts Peacefully
Use Diplomacy – Not Weapons


     


           


         


So another year, and once again we have failed

failed to prioritize people and the planet

failed to invest in children and caregiving

failed to expand affordable health care

failed to reduce poverty and inequality

failed to strengthen the middle class

failed to reduce climate change and stop pollution


Many social groups and citizens of America

are advocating for

New Priorities in Budget Spending

...and instead of spending

1/2 of our available budget on the Military

Let's Reduce military spending –

and use this money for improving people's lives,

raising the standard of living for all people,

improving cities, farmlands, and natural ecosystems,

helping suffering people in the world,

and solving the global climate problem.


Unfortunately though...

War, and exaggerated fears 'of being threatened',

diverts attention from domestic problems

and diverts money from needed social programs.


Pentagon spending has totaled over $14 Trillion since the start of the war in Afghanistan, with 1/3 to 1/2 of this going to military contractors.

A large portion of military contracts have gone to just five major corporations: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman. In 2020, Lockheed Martin received $75 Billion – while the total combined budget for the State Department and the Agency for International Development was $44 Billion.

Unfortunately though, because the Pentagon has not done a competent or transparent accounting for these and other appropriations, we have no reliable assurance of how, or even where, the funds were actually spent.

Numerous companies took advantage of "wartime conditions" – which involves 'less-rigorous oversight' – and thus contractors were able to overcharge the government or even engage in outright fraud. In 2011, the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan estimated that waste, fraud and abuse had totaled between $30 to $60 Billion. Therefore, Congress should require the Department of Defense Inspector General to conduct a Comprehensive Audit of the actual amounts of all federal funding spent on wars, and should make the report publicly available.

Recently the U.S. pulled out its military forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, so one would think that this allowed the military-complex to be reduced. But oh no. New urgent threats suddenly emerged, and as the US-led NATO began expanding into Ukraine, Russia responded by invading Ukraine – which is of course tragic for Ukraine and costing over 100,000 dead or severely injured – yet being increasingly profitable for the US weapons industry, now and into the future; (though exceedingly expensive to American taxpayers). And thus, the wars continue (rather than resolve these conflicts diplomatically), and so too does the military budget and military contracts keep increasing.

In the State Dept. and in Congress, the defense advisors and lobbyists keep the alarms and urgencies on high pitch, with their exaggerated estimates of new “military challenges” posed by China and Russia ("expanding into eastern Europe") – which have become the 'new rationale' for keeping the Pentagon Budget at increasingly high levels – conveniently allowing Military Contractors to continue heaping huge profits from their exaggerated "threats to democracy" or "threats to America", while the war in Ukraine (as well as its post-war reconstruction costs) will be Very Profitable for weapons industries and other military contractors.

Weapons-makers and other military contractors have spent $2.5 Billion on lobbying over the past two decades, employing on average over 700 lobbyists per year over the past five years – which is more than one weapons-lobbyist for every single member of Congress!

Weapons makers have spent $2.5 Billion on lobbying over the past two decades, employing, on average, over 700 lobbyists per year over the past five years. That is more than one weapons-lobbyist for every single member of Congress!

~ Watson Institute, Brown University




Instead of having a bloated Dept of War
Let us have a strong Dept of Peace

Untold Histories
Salon.com 2014

Ending the war
    in Ukraine →



contact